nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 /64 links (was Re: ipv6 book recommendations?)


From: TJ <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:38:38 -0400

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Masataka Ohta <
mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
<MAJOR SNIP>


The center part of the internet is the easiest part of
modification for IPv6 and is probably somewhere near 99%
complete at this point.

That is a fairy tale once believed by so many infants who
thought dual stack were enough.



Just injecting a real-world comment/observation here:

I am sitting at home, on my natively IPv6 connected, Comcast-provided
residential service.
My phone is sitting next to me, connected to VZW's IPv6-capable LTE network.
When I go to one of my client sites, they get IPv6 through a HE.net tunnel.
Another client site uses AT&T and/or CenturyLink for IPv6 connectivity.
*... the list goes on ...*


In all cases, IPv6 is alive and well for me.
More importantly (even though the last-mile is not ubiquitously
IPv6-enabled in all service regions) those five providers have backbones
that are 100% up and running, native IPv6 all over the place.  So what is
the fairy tale??

Am I saying we are all done, and that IPv6 is fully deployed?  Of course
not, lots of work to do in the enterprise and last-mile areas ... but
progress has been noticeable and is accelerating.


/TJ


Current thread: