nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 day and tunnels
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:26:15 -0700
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:
On 6/3/12, Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org> wrote:If one is so stupid to just block ICMP then one should also accept that one loses functionality.ICMP tends to get blocked by firewalls by default; There are legitimate reasons to block ICMP, esp w V6. Security device manufacturers tend to indicate all the "lost functionality" is optional functionality not required for a working device.
In case security policy folks need a reference on what ICMPv6 functionality is required for IPv6 to work correctly, please reference http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4890.txt CB
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 07)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 12)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 12)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 12)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Cameron Byrne (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels bmanning (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jeroen Massar (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jeroen Massar (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jeroen Massar (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jared Mauch (Jun 04)