nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:07:20 -0400
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:52:17 -0000, "Nagendra Kumar (naikumar)" said:
Per my understanding, it is not required to have ipv6 address in loopback intf on all P routers inorder to have 6PE work. If I remember it correctly, P router will use ::FFFF::<ipv4-addr> while originating ICMPv6 error message.
How the heck is that supposed to work in an all-IPv6 network where you don't *have* an ipv4-addr? Plus, as Owen noted, leaking those on the wire is considered bad form.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE james jones (Jun 15)
- RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) (Jun 15)
- RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE adam vitkovsky (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Owen DeLong (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Robert McKay (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Owen DeLong (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE valdis . kletnieks (Jun 15)