nanog mailing list archives
Re: very confusing.
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:34:05 +1000
In message <4FD91056.3030206 () foobar org>, Nick Hilliard writes:
Be advised that Im following your posts and have your threating messages to me. If there is an ddos or restraint of trade due to my ACCIDENTAL email I'll escalate to commerce and FBI.1. spam a big pile of network operators 2. threaten legals on aforementioned prospective customers 3. profit!!11!! awesome. Nick
Complain to you Congress and House Representatives that CAN-SPAM is too unbalanced. The current US law lets you get away with single shots. It should be a offence to send to someone you don't have consent from. Look at the Australian SPAM act for a more balanced act. As long as US law allows companies to harvest addresses and send to them this sort of thing will continue to happen. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: very confusing. Randy Bush (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Richard Golodner (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. jim deleskie (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Nick Hilliard (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Mark Andrews (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Charles Morris (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Randy Epstein (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Mark Andrews (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Richard Golodner (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Lynda (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Greg Ihnen (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Joe Greco (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Owen DeLong (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. George Herbert (Jun 13)
- Re: very confusing. Joe Greco (Jun 13)