nanog mailing list archives
Accuracy of RFCs (was: Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting)
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:46:30 -0400
On Jun 1, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
It's extremely hard to find RFC which does not contain incorrect information or practically undeployable data.
Actual errors in RFC's (typos, incorrect references, etc.) - <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php> Differing views regarding RFC subject material; feel free to work with others of similar to write up your perspective - <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2223.txt> The RFC series is an Internet-wide community effort. Thanks! /John
Current thread:
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Daniel Suchy (Jun 01)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Saku Ytti (Jun 01)
- Accuracy of RFCs (was: Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting) John Curran (Jun 01)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Joe Provo (Jun 01)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Daniel Suchy (Jun 01)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 01)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Daniel Suchy (Jun 02)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Joe Provo (Jun 01)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Daniel Suchy (Jun 02)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Joe Provo (Jun 02)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Daniel Suchy (Jun 02)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Daniel Suchy (Jun 01)
- Re: HE.net BGP origin attribute rewriting Saku Ytti (Jun 01)