nanog mailing list archives
RE: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?
From: George Bonser <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:12:24 +0000
From: Ryan Rawdon Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 7:06 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?
No solution to the issue was found in the various forks of that thread, however one individual afflicted by this issue (the OP) seems to have resolved his specific issue with Hotmail by fixing his MX records to be in stricter compliance with RFCs and best practices (removed a CNAME) - that said, per the quote above Hotmail should not have been falling back to the A records or any other RRs for the hostname.
I would say MX pointing to a CNAME instead of pointing to an A record is the #1 cause of intermittent mail delivery problems I have seen. Some MTAs seem to tolerate it, some don't. G
Current thread:
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?, (continued)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? Mark Andrews (Jul 26)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? Michael J Wise (Jul 26)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? Mark Andrews (Jul 26)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? Scott Howard (Jul 27)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? William Herrin (Jul 29)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? Mark Andrews (Jul 30)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? William Herrin (Jul 30)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? valdis . kletnieks (Jul 30)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? Jimmy Hess (Jul 30)
- RE: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? George Bonser (Jul 26)
- Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records? Lou Katz (Jul 26)