nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why use PeeringDB?
From: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:55:41 -0400
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann () gmail com> wrote:
I am currently working on a BCOP for IPv6 Peering and Transit and would very much appreciate some expert information on why using PeeringDB is a best practice (or why its not). All opinions are welcome, but be aware that I plan on using the responses to enhance the document, which will be made publicly available as one of several (and hopefully many more) BCOPs published at http://www.ipbcop.org/.
Well, PeeringDB is basically the first stop for anyone who wants to potentially peer with you, or has received a peering request from you. (Some people even scrape the database to find potential peers based on traffic levels and existing peering locations.) A database of easy-to-access contact information, internet exchanges, and facilities is a boon to even non-peering tasks, such as finding a noc email. Basically, if you have a clue and want to peer, or even just be a good netizen, having and maintaining an up-to-date PeeringDB entry is a good idea. Simple as that. -- Darius Jahandarie
Current thread:
- Why use PeeringDB? Chris Grundemann (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Darius Jahandarie (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Jonathan Lassoff (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Zaid Ali (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Jonathan Lassoff (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Darius Jahandarie (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Jonathan Lassoff (Jul 18)