nanog mailing list archives
Re: Real world sflow vs netflow?
From: Paolo Lucente <pl+list () pmacct net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:16:58 +0000
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:30:25AM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
NetFlow supports [ .. ] As well as L2 traffic (v9) [ .. ]
Let's be real and speak implementations: where is L2 information in NetFlow for routed traffic on bigger platforms typically thrown for peering at internet exchanges - ASR9K, C7600 (ie. hopefully without get to invest more money in such platform to upgrade to Sup2T), MX, CRS? Cheers, Paolo PS: Let's not return on the point of availability of MAC accounting, since that is not the solution.
Current thread:
- Real world sflow vs netflow? David Hubbard (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Jeroen Massar (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Harry Hoffman (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Joe Loiacono (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Łukasz Bromirski (Jul 14)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 14)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Łukasz Bromirski (Jul 14)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Paolo Lucente (Jul 15)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Nick Hilliard (Jul 15)
- RE: Real world sflow vs netflow? James Braunegg (Jul 16)
- RE: Real world sflow vs netflow? David Hubbard (Jul 16)
- RE: Real world sflow vs netflow? James Braunegg (Jul 16)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Simon Leinen (Jul 17)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Nick Hilliard (Jul 17)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Jul 17)