Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space

[-Hammer- <bhmccie () gmail com>]

<bashes head against wall>

Thank you all. It's not the protocol that hurts. It's rethinking the
culture/philosophy around it.

-Hammer-

On 7/14/12 3:20 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com> wrote:

> They're a bad thing in IPv6.
>
> The only place for security through obscurity IMHO is a small round
> container that sits next to my desk.
>
> Besides, if you don't advertise it, a GUA prefix is just as obscure as a
> ULA prefix and provides a larger search space in which one has to hunt
> for it... Think /3 instead of /8.
>
> Owen
>
> On Jul 14, 2012, at 1:14 PM, -Hammer- wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >    The whole purpose of this is that they do NOT need to be global.
> > Security thru obscurity. It actually has a place in some worlds. Does
> > that
> > make sense? Or are such V4-centric approaches a bad thing in v6?
> >
> > On 7/13/12 8:41 PM, "Brandon Ross" <bross () pobox com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Jul 13, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > keep life simple.  use global ipv6 space.
> > > > >
> > > > > randy
> > > >
> > > > Though it is rare, this is one time when I absolutely agree with
> > > > Randy.
> > >
> > > It's even more rare for me to agree with Randy AND Owen at the same
> > > time.
> > >
> > > -- 
> > > Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:
> > > BrandonNRoss
> > > +1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:
> > > 2269442
> > > Schedule a meeting:  https://tungle.me/bross             Skype:
> > > brandonross