nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Cidr Report

From: Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:44:25 +0200

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:48:47AM +1000, Skeeve Stevens wrote:

I think the effort to moderate this particular list would be far to much
effort.


Most mailing lists allow moderation of new list members by default.
Typically, the moderation is removed after the first non-spam post.
This causes negligible workload in general.

Current thread:

The Cidr Report cidr-report (Jul 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report HUGE NOG (Jul 13)
  - Re: The Cidr Report HUGE NOG (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report HUGE NOG (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report HUGE NOG (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report HUGE NOG (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report HUGE NOG (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Grant Ridder (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Skeeve Stevens (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Eugen Leitl (Jul 14)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Lynda (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Grant Ridder (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report JC Dill (Jul 13)
    - Communications Committee volunteers [was: The Cidr Report] Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 13)
    - Re: Communications Committee volunteers [was: The Cidr Report] Jared Mauch (Jul 13)
    - Re: Communications Committee volunteers [was: The Cidr Report] Grant Ridder (Jul 13)
    - Re: Communications Committee volunteers [was: The Cidr Report] Sean Harlow (Jul 13)
    - Re: The Cidr Report HUGE NOG (Jul 13)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Jul 13)
  - Re: The Cidr Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 13)

(Thread continues...)