![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton)
From: bas <kilobit () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:40:03 +0100
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:
On (2012-01-27 17:35 +0100), bas wrote: But generally nice list, especially the 10GE fixed config looked realistic, sometimes I wish we'd have 'dpreview' style page for routers and switches, especially now with dozen or more vendors selling 'same' trident+ switch, differentiating them is hard.
But do you generally agree that "the market" has a requirement for a deep-buffer TOR switch? Or am I crazy for thinking that my customers need such a solution? Bas
Current thread:
- 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) bas (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) Saku Ytti (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) bas (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) Leo Bicknell (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) bas (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) Leo Bicknell (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) bas (Jan 27)
- Message not available
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) bas (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) Nick Hilliard (Jan 27)
- RE: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) George Bonser (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) bas (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) Saku Ytti (Jan 27)
- RE: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) George Bonser (Jan 27)
- Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) bas (Jan 27)
- RE: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton) George Bonser (Jan 27)