nanog mailing list archives
RE: MD5?
From: George Bonser <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:40:57 +0000
All that may be true, but still, the random hacker in Romania who wants in on their BGP session won't know the secret...probably. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net |
One thing I will do at shared peering switches is to also configure static ARP or IPv6 neighbor entries in the router for my peers. This protects against some new arrival on the switch accidentally configuring one of my peer's IP addresses on their gear and blowing up my session. That does cause some problems when a peer does maintenance that changes their MAC address, but I notice it fairly quickly.
Current thread:
- Re: MD5 considered harmful, (continued)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful Zaid Ali (Jan 27)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 27)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful John Kristoff (Jan 30)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful Keegan Holley (Jan 30)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful harbor235 (Jan 31)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful David Barak (Jan 31)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful Nick Hilliard (Jan 31)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful harbor235 (Jan 31)
- Re: MD5 considered harmful Lee (Jan 31)
- Re: MD5? Joel jaeggli (Jan 27)
- RE: MD5? George Bonser (Jan 27)