nanog mailing list archives
Re: LX sfp minimum range
From: Wayne E Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:19:38 -0700
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:48:05PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 13:47, David Storandt <dstorandt () teljet com> wrote:You can put a 3dB or 5dB optical pad on the link if the receiver can't handle zero-distance optical power.As I recall, the problem may not only be the power (which can cause receiver saturation), but issue that fibre paths shorter than (around) 2-10m do not properly condition the light(*), which can result in some issues at the receiver. Gary (*) My memory says modal distribution issues. While 'single mode' fibre only supports one mode of transmission, it takes a short distance for the fibre to really be single mode. You can use a mode filter to address the problem, or just use fibres that are at least a few meters.
When optics started to become scarce at various times, I've done a number of back-to-back connections using SM fiber and have had zero issues. I wouldn't even worry about it. Remember, many carriers won't even touch MM and they aren't chronically reporting issues or going to lengths to work around them. -Wayne --- Wayne Bouchard web () typo org Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/
Current thread:
- Re: LX sfp minimum range, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 26)
- RE: LX sfp minimum range George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Message not available
- RE: LX sfp minimum range George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range PC (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Steven Tardy (Jan 27)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 27)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Tom Storey (Jan 29)
- Message not available
- RE: LX sfp minimum range George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Gary Buhrmaster (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Wayne E Bouchard (Jan 26)