nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why not to use RPKI (Was Re: Argus: a hijacking alarm system)


From: Yang Xiang <xiangy08 () csnet1 cs tsinghua edu cn>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:43:23 +0800

2012/1/24 John Kemp <kemp () network-services uoregon edu>


Minor correction there.  If you are talking about our IX collectors
(LINX, PAIX,
EQIX Ashburn, SYDNEY, etc.) those are at exchanges and peering
directly.  The
collectors at Univ of Oregon (rv,rv2,rv3,rv4, rv6), yeah, those are
multi-hop.
Doesn't detract from your point, but I think it helps if people are
aware of whether
they are on the exchange or on a multihop when using routeviews collectors.

We talk about routeservers, not collectors.
Argus doesn't use routeservers in RouteViews to identify hijacking.



Only other thing to add, I don't think anyone mentioned Cyclops in this
thread.
Just as another data point, see also: http://cyclops.6watch.net or
http://cyclops.cs.ucla.edu

John Kemp (kemp () routeviews org)


-- 
_________________________________________
Yang Xiang. Ph.D candidate. Tsinghua University
Argus: argus.csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn


Current thread: