nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIS raw data
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:34:49 +0900
Please don't conflate the policy mechanisms enabled by the IRR policy *language*/specification itself with the *data* contained in the IRR
i don't. the former is called rpsl.
some years back, i asked for a *simple minimal* tagging of announcements to route views, just peer, customer, internal. it got ietfed to utter uselessness, with more crap welded on to it than envisioned in mad max.Wrt your last paragraph: care to share a link the I-D (or, RFC) that you allude to above?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-collection-communities-08
I think your last paragraph is alluding to tagging routes with standard BGP communities, based on your "simple minimal" criteria, before they are sent to route-views. That strikes me as potentially orthogonal to issues with the present data in the IRR.
but not orthogonal to the op's direct question. randy
Current thread:
- RIS raw data andra . lutu (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data Nick Hilliard (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data Randy Bush (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data Danny McPherson (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data andra . lutu (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data Shane Amante (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data Randy Bush (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data Peter Kristolaitis (Jan 19)
- RE: RIS raw data Leigh Porter (Jan 19)
- Re: RIS raw data Robert Bonomi (Jan 19)