nanog mailing list archives
Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
From: Thomas Donnelly <tad1214 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:34:56 -0800
I have used the ASR1002-F in a previous life and I was very pleased with it. Performance was a massive increase from the 3845 we had. The warm standby IOS is a nice feature for in service upgrades and crash avoidance. I don't have much experience with the MX series of things but you would be happy with the ASR assuming it meets your bandwidth/port density requirements. -=Tom On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jon Heise <jon () smugmug com> wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with these two routers, we're looking to buy one of them but i have little experience dealing with cisco routers and zero experience with juniper.
Current thread:
- juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 jon Heise (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Thomas Donnelly (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 amaged (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Thomas Donnelly (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 PC (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Josh Hoppes (Jan 19)
- RE: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Leigh Porter (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Ariel Biener (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Skeeve Stevens (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Ariel Biener (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Saku Ytti (Jan 20)