nanog mailing list archives
Re: Slighty OT: GoDaddy and SPF records...
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:46:35 +0530
I fully agree. http://www.circleid.com/posts/spf_loses_mindshare/ dates back to 2005. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Lynda <shrdlu () deaddrop org> wrote:
Let me quickly reiterate what Anurag Bhatia has already told you. TXT records are what you need. I went through a LOT of completely unnecessary suffering, and discovered that while you CAN create an SPF record, what you really need is a TXT record that performs this service. Save yourself some suffering, and don't even bother with the SPF record (this is for those of you who are just now considering making such a thing). GoDaddy (for once) has saved you some sadness, here.
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Slighty OT: GoDaddy and SPF records... Mike Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Slighty OT: GoDaddy and SPF records... Anurag Bhatia (Jan 17)
- Re: Slighty OT: GoDaddy and SPF records... Jimmy Hess (Jan 17)
- Re: Slighty OT: GoDaddy and SPF records... Rohan Sheth (Jan 17)
- Re: Slighty OT: GoDaddy and SPF records... Lynda (Jan 17)
- Re: Slighty OT: GoDaddy and SPF records... Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 17)
- Re: Slighty OT: GoDaddy and SPF records... Anurag Bhatia (Jan 17)