nanog mailing list archives

Re: How are you doing DHCPv6 ?


From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen () network1 net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:19:28 -0500 (EST)


You might want to give this a read:

 http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider-02.txt

That doesn't really help us if we want to deploy before that draft becomes a standard.

Are there any DHCPv6 servers currently that actually function in a fashion that is suitable for service providers?

-Randy

 
-------- Original Message --------
 From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen () network1 net>
 Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2012 5:4 PM
 To: Nanog <nanog () nanog org>
 CC:
 Subject: How are you doing DHCPv6 ?


I am wondering how people out there are using DHCPv6 to handle
assigning prefixes to end users.

We have a requirement for it to be a redundant server that is
centrally located. DHCPv6 will be relayed from each customer access
segment.

We have been looking at using ISC dhcpd, as that is what we use for
v4. However, it currently does not support any redundancy. It also
does not do very much useful logging for DHCPv6 requests. Certainly
not enough to keep track of users and devices.

So, my questions are:


How are you doing DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation?

What software are you using?


When DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation seems to be about the only way to
deploy IPv6 to end users in a generic device-agnostic fashion, I am
wondering why it is so difficult to find a working solution.

thanks,
-Randy

--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
----






Current thread: