nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whois 172/12
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:17:20 +0000
On 15 Jan 2012, at 07:39, "Ted Fischer" <ted () fred net> wrote:
Hi all, Tearing what's left of my hair out. A customer is getting scanned by a host claiming to be "172.0.1.216". I know this is bogus, but I want to go back to the customer with as much authoritative umph as I can (heaven forbid they just take my word). I'm pretty sure I read somewhere once that 172/12 was "reserved" or something like that. All I can find now is that 172/8 is "administered by ARIN". Lots of information on 172.16/12, but not a peep about 172/12. If anybody could provide some insight as to the allocation/non-allocation of this block, it would be much appreciated. Thanks. Ted Fischer
I would look for the prefix in your BGP table and in a couple of looking glasses and show the empty output. If its not there, then it is bogus. -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Re: Whois 172/12, (continued)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
- RE: Whois 172/12 Network IP Dog (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Tom Hill (Jan 19)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Robert Bonomi (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 bmanning (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Jon Lewis (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Jay Moran (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Whois 172/12 Alex Ryu (Jan 15)