nanog mailing list archives
Re: In search of uplink vendor
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:01:58 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul Kaminsky wrote:
We are at a stage where we need an all-out uplink vendor to fuel our business endeavor. The bells and whistles we need are: 1. 1 Gbps link with complete block of UDP/ICMP protocol 2. BGP session with our AS 3. Ability to blackhole (no route to host) by /32 prefix 4. Presence in Equinix SV1 or SV5 (San Jose) DC's - this is not mandatory, we're open for suggestionsIf you feel your company measures up or is a cut above the rest, please get in touch with us to discuss the specific details.
Note: I am not a vendor. One question:1. Not knowing anything about your business, is there a specific reason that you want "a complete block of UDP/ICMP protocol"? That can be problematic with IPv4, and downright foolish with IPv6.
jms
Current thread:
- In search of uplink vendor Paul Kaminsky (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor Justin M. Streiner (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor bmanning (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor Justin M. Streiner (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor bmanning (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor Leo Bicknell (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor Christopher Morrow (Jan 12)
- RE: In search of uplink vendor Network IP Dog (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor Leo Bicknell (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor bmanning (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor Jay Ashworth (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor bmanning (Jan 12)
- Re: In search of uplink vendor Justin M. Streiner (Jan 12)