nanog mailing list archives
Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses
From: Bernhard Schmidt <berni () birkenwald de>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:16:50 +0000 (UTC)
Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=<pedrom () nexo es> rejected RCPT <owner-radiusext () ops ietf org>: blocked because 118.39.80.118 is in blacklist at rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org: Mail from 118.39.80.118 blocked using Trend Micro Email Reputation database. Please see <http://www.mail-abuse.com/cgi-bin/lookup?118.39.80.118> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 no host name found for IP address 118.39.80.118 2012-01-04 00:37:29 REJECT 118.39.80.118 too many bad recip 2012-01-04 00:37:29 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org 7.8% is over ipv6 transport but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6. what do other folk see?
Main inbound MX for a large educational institution sees around 5% of mails coming in via IPv6. Might be a bit biased due to holiday season. Outbound is mostly running on legacy servers without IPv6, yet :-( Bernhard
Current thread:
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses, (continued)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Jared Mauch (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Leo Bicknell (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses James Cloos (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Christopher Morrow (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Sebastian Spies (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Phil Regnauld (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Simon Perreault (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Mike Tancsa (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Dave Israel (Jan 04)
- Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses Bernhard Schmidt (Jan 06)