nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked Network Ranges
From: John Schneider <str8steelerfan () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:20:10 -0600
If you both announce a /24, the BGP route selection process should begin to return some of the traffic to these prefixes back to your AS. Also, if you begin to advertise your prefixes as /24s and as a result, they try to advertise /25s, I would venture a guess that their /25s would get blocked entirely, effectively returning traffic to those prefixes to you. that would be best-case scenario until you can get someone at AS36111 to listen to you. Best of Luck to you
Upstream requirements. Additionally, I don't believe it would do us any good. If they're announcing /24 now, why would they not announce a /25.
Current thread:
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges, (continued)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges Chuck Church (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Kelvin Williams (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Ricky Beam (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Keegan Holley (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Ido Szargel (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Eric Tykwinski (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Keegan Holley (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Andrew Fried (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges John Schneider (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges John Schneider (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges George Bonser (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges Chuck Church (Jan 31)