nanog mailing list archives

Re: 10G switchrecommendaton


From: Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:00:15 -0500



On Jan 29, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net> wrote:

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 08:02:28PM -0200, Alvaro Pereira wrote:
And note that the Juniper EX2500 does not run JUNOS, it is just an OEM box
from someone else...

Blade Networks, now IBM.

If I remember correctly I believe Blade Networks licenses the same fulcrum ASIC's as the Arista's.


Alvaro

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:23, Tim Vollebregt <tim () interworx nl> wrote:

2,5MB shared approximately.

Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box.

-Tim


On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote:

How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ??

Kindest Regards

James Braunegg
W:  1300 769 972  |  M:  0488 997 207 |  D:  (03) 9751 7616
E:   james.braunegg () micron21 com  |  ABN:  12 109 977 666


This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it
to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in
error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then
delete the message from your computer.


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:tim () interworx nl]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton

I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really
small buffers.

EX3300 as TOR
EX82** as 10G aggregator

-Tim

On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote:

Juniper EX4500.

-RR

On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2000 () gmail com>   wrote:

Hi all

I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test
around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!

Thank you





-- 
        RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE / NewNOG



Current thread: