nanog mailing list archives
Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:21:38 +0900
Christian Esteve wrote:
May be there is some light with Multipath TCP: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/slides/mptcp-0.pdf http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mptcp/charter/
Not bad.
If you can live without UDP and other issues discussed in this bizarre discussion...
UDP connection, if any, by definition, totally depends on users (applications) that handling of multiple addresses must depend on application protocols. A good news is that DNS, the most major application over UDP, supports multiple addresses of name servers from the beginning. Anyway, you can still live with applications over UDP without support for multiple addresses. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one? Masataka Ohta (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one? Masataka Ohta (Jan 01)
- Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one? Masataka Ohta (Jan 11)
- Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one? William Allen Simpson (Jan 11)