nanog mailing list archives
Re: Common operational misconceptions
From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:45:26 -0500
On Friday, February 17, 2012 01:30:30 AM Carsten Bormann wrote:
Ah, one of the greatest misconceptions still around in 2012:
-- OSI Layer numbers mean something. or -- Somewhere in the sky, there is an exact definition of what is layer 2, layer 3, layer 4, layer 5 (!), layer 7
Misconception: Layers are not recursive. Thanks to tunneling/MPLS/other encapsulation techniques, they are.
Current thread:
- RE: Common operational misconceptions, (continued)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions Mario Eirea (Feb 17)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions George Bonser (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Paul Graydon (Feb 17)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Paul Graydon (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Michael Painter (Feb 18)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Paul Graydon (Feb 18)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions George Bonser (Feb 18)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Michael Painter (Feb 18)
- National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Sean Donelan (Feb 18)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Lamar Owen (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Michael Sinatra (Feb 16)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Justin M. Streiner (Feb 18)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Jared Mauch (Feb 16)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Steve Bertrand (Feb 15)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Jeroen van Aart (Feb 18)