nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing?
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:56:18 +0530
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
They do internal aggregation of common prefixes to keep their internal tables small, see for instance this rather old preso: http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.pptwhy should swisscom pay for your traffic engineering?
Nobody at all is asking them to pay for it. But do you seriously expect their routing tables to become full to bursting because, for example, they checked the ARIN route registry, RADB etc instead of blindly using minimum prefix size defaults? Or are swamp space legacy IP ranges with minimum prefix size of /24 that easy to get in this day and age? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing? Schiller, Heather A (Feb 01)
- Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing? Jeroen Massar (Feb 01)
- Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing? Jared Mauch (Feb 01)
- Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 01)
- Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing? Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 01)
- Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing? Jeroen Massar (Feb 01)