nanog mailing list archives
RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000
-----Original Message----- From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim () brandontek com] Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51 To: blake () pfankuch me; jay () miscreant org; jra () baylink com Cc: nanog group Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it is CLUNKY. But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco in the near future...
Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco style interface rather than something with some more structure like Juniper? -- Leigh Porter ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Sonicwall 3500/netflow Jay Ashworth (Feb 13)
- Re: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Jay Mitchell (Feb 14)
- RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Blake Pfankuch (Feb 14)
- RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Brandon Kim (Feb 14)
- RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Leigh Porter (Feb 14)
- RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Brandon Kim (Feb 14)
- RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Blake Pfankuch (Feb 14)
- RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Blake Pfankuch (Feb 14)
- Re: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Jay Mitchell (Feb 14)