![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs
From: Aleksi Suhonen <nanog-poster () axu tm>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:50:51 +0200
Hello, keith tokash wrote:
I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups. We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered;
I haven't really looked very hard, since I subscribe to the stated reasons for keeping v4 and v6 sessions apart. (migration, max-pfx, ...)
BUTTo my knowledge, JunOS doesn't even support using a single TCP session to exchange routes of all address families. If someone knows how to do this - if even for just IPv4 and IPv6 unicast - let me know ... ;-)
-- Aleksi Suhonen / Axu TM Oy World Wide Web: www.axu.tm
Current thread:
- IPv6 explicit BGP group configs keith tokash (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Leo Bicknell (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Grzegorz Janoszka (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Leo Bicknell (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Joel jaeggli (Feb 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Aleksi Suhonen (Feb 12)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Owen DeLong (Feb 12)