nanog mailing list archives
Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack
From: bas <kilobit () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:07:19 +0100
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012, at 2:56 PM, bas wrote:The big drawback with S/RTBH is that it is a DoS method in itself.I'm not an advocate of *automated* S/RTBH, and I am an advocate of whitelisting various well-known 'golden networks/IPs'
So I would need to find out which networks you would have classified as "golden" and use those as sources for my DDoS. Either I can achieve DoS with S/RTBH, or I can abuse the "golden networks" to circumvent S/RTBH. As far as I see it S/RTBH is in no way a solution against smart attackers, of course it does help against all the kiddie attacks out there. Bas
Current thread:
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack, (continued)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Drew Weaver (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Feb 09)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Steve Bertrand (Feb 09)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 09)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Christopher Morrow (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack George Bonser (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Mark Andrews (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Dobbins, Roland (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack bas (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Dobbins, Roland (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Steve Bertrand (Feb 05)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 05)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Steve Bertrand (Feb 05)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Jeff Wheeler (Feb 05)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack dennis (Feb 06)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Feb 06)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Jeff Wheeler (Feb 06)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 06)