nanog mailing list archives
RE: Console Server Recommendation
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:15:53 -0600
We use WTI, too, just don't like it that it reboots to apply a change. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Christopher O'Brien [mailto:obriapqz () bc edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 9:59 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Console Server Recommendation On 1/30/12 11:08 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
What are people using for console servers these days? We've historically used retired routers with ASYNC ports, but it's time for an upgrade. OpenGear seems to have some nice stuff, anyone else?
I've been using Western Telematic TSM-40 console servers and have been very happy with the price point and feature set. Also, I aggregate console connections from different parts of my campus over my existing fiber plant using TC Communications TC1880 Async Fiber MUXs. This combination has served me well.
Current thread:
- Re: Console Server Recommendation Christopher O'Brien (Feb 01)
- RE: Console Server Recommendation Frank Bulk (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Console Server Recommendation Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Console Server Recommendation Saku Ytti (Feb 01)
- Re: Console Server Recommendation Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- RE: Console Server Recommendation George Bonser (Feb 01)
- Re: Console Server Recommendation Saku Ytti (Feb 01)
- Re: Console Server Recommendation Chris Adams (Feb 01)