nanog mailing list archives
Re: do not filter your customers
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:27:18 +0530
and things when further downhill from there, when telstra also did not filter what they announced to their peers, and the peers went over prefix limits and dropped bgp.Oh! so protections worked!
imiho, prefix count is too big a hammer. it would have been better if optus had irr-based filters in place on peerings with telstra. then they would not have dropped the sessions and their customers could still reach telstra customers. of course, if telstra did not publish accurately in an irr instance, not much optus could do. randy
Current thread:
- do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 22)
- RE: do not filter your customers Christian Nielsen (Feb 22)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 22)
- Re: do not filter your customers Christopher Morrow (Feb 22)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 22)
- Re: do not filter your customers Peter Ehiwe (Feb 22)
- Re: do not filter your customers Anurag Bhatia (Feb 23)
- Re: do not filter your customers Christopher Morrow (Feb 23)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 22)
- Re: do not filter your customers Danny McPherson (Feb 23)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 23)
- Re: do not filter your customers Danny McPherson (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Steven Bellovin (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers goemon (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Joe Maimon (Feb 24)
- RE: do not filter your customers Christian Nielsen (Feb 22)
- Re: do not filter your customers Danny McPherson (Feb 24)