![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: RADB entry
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:51:10 -0500
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eric Krichbaum <eric () telic us> wrote:
The origin being entered by a provider as their own allows them to add the prefix (and have it accepted by anyone who filters them by prefix generated) without being forced to add a downstream (and downstream's downstreams) AS to their AS-SET.
'proxy registration'... so nice... now you can't control your prefix data in radb, how quaint! 'proxy registration' - never a good idea... not ever... adding cruft that's not connected to the data owner to the database? recipe for stale/old-n-busted data... hurray.
Current thread:
- RADB entry Chuck Church (Dec 11)
- RE: RADB entry Eric Krichbaum (Dec 11)
- Re: RADB entry Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- RE: RADB entry Eric Krichbaum (Dec 11)
- Re: RADB entry Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: RADB entry Matt Addison (Dec 11)
- Re: RADB entry Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- RE: RADB entry Eric Krichbaum (Dec 11)
- RE: RADB entry Chuck Church (Dec 11)
- Re: RADB entry Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RADB entry Courtney Smith (Dec 11)
- Message not available
- Re: RADB entry Courtney Smith (Dec 11)
- Message not available