Re: IPv6 End User Fee

[George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>]

If anyone's ISPs are overcharging them, I will be able to provide
service for no more than 1 cent per available routable IPv6 address in
any netblock from /64 on up.  We have a reasonable startup rate of a
/56 for the price of a /64 for the remainder of 2012, even!

-george

On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Derek Ivey <derek () derekivey com> wrote:
> If my ISP charged me fees for IPv6 space, I'd ditch them. They already make
> enough money as is from modem/cable box rentals.
>
> Derek
>
>
> On 8/3/2012 6:12 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. <otis () ocosa com>
> > wrote:
> > > Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p
> > >
> > > Just wondering, with so many IPv6 resources in a single allocation it
> > > would seem difficult to charge anything at all.
> > >
> > > 1. How are you making up loss of revenue on IPv4 assignments?
> > > 2. Are you charging anything?
> > > 3. Is the cost built into the service?
> > > 4. Do you assign IPv6 space to end user and charge admin fee?
> > >
> > > Take care,
> > >
> > > Otis
> > IPv6 users cost me less money (CGN resources), i wish i had a business
> > method for giving them discounts and meaningful incentives for using
> > IPv6.
> >
> > Today, my retail mobile phones users can have 1 NAT'd IPv4 address or
> > 2^64 public IPv6 addresses + NAT64 to reach IPv4 destinations.   Most
> > don't use the IPv6 address option yet :(
> >
> > But the number of folks electing to use IPv6 is increasing with more
> > phones available (4 Androids now support HSPA+ IPv6) and more IPv6
> > awareness
> >
> > CB



-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert () gmail com