nanog mailing list archives
RE: Level 3 BGP Advertisements
From: John van Oppen <jvanoppen () spectrumnet us>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:01:04 +0000
I have ended up excluding .0 and .255 from our DHCP pools in larger than /24 subents due to this exact issue in the past... It is a PITA. I wish people would update filters. John
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements, (continued)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Jon Lewis (Aug 29)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Randy (Aug 29)
- RE: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Hale, William C (Aug 29)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements William Herrin (Aug 29)
- $10k per BGP prefix? (was Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements) Jay Ashworth (Aug 29)
- Re: $10k per BGP prefix? (was Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements) Peter Kristolaitis (Aug 29)
- Re: $10k per BGP prefix? (was Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements) William Herrin (Aug 29)
- RE: Level 3 BGP Advertisements STARNES, CURTIS (Aug 29)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Grzegorz Janoszka (Aug 29)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements james machado (Aug 29)
- RE: Level 3 BGP Advertisements John van Oppen (Aug 29)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Matt Addison (Aug 29)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Blake Hudson (Aug 30)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements james machado (Aug 30)
- RE: Level 3 BGP Advertisements John van Oppen (Aug 30)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 30)
- $10k per BGP prefix? (was Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements) Jay Ashworth (Aug 29)
- RE: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Harry Hoffman (Aug 29)
- Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements Jon Lewis (Aug 29)