nanog mailing list archives
Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:18:45 -0400
On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net> wrote:
How does one suddenly justify needing 1,000,000 more IP addresses (explosive expected growth in the next couple months?)
I can easily see people moving through those IPs in short order if you have a datacenter or other deployment you are working on. I've heard stories from some of the popular sites about how they have consumed all the 'private' space for their internal-side servers/infrastructure so started to go after public IPs (in addition to IPv6) to workaround the problem. AT&T hasn't seen the wireline subscriber growth, but I'm sure their wireless side, datacenter, and other needs are driving growth. - Jared
Current thread:
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated, (continued)
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated David Miller (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated valdis . kletnieks (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jimmy Hess (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated joel jaeggli (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Dan White (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated George Herbert (Aug 22)
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Owen DeLong (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Blake Hudson (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jared Mauch (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Seth Mattinen (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated joel jaeggli (Aug 23)
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Owen DeLong (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jeroen van Aart (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated joel jaeggli (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jeroen van Aart (Aug 23)