nanog mailing list archives
Re: Copyright infringement notice
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:40 -0700
On Aug 22, 2012, at 14:53 , Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com> wrote:
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com () nanog org Wed Aug 22 14:55:41 2012 From: Larry Smith <lesmith () ecsis net> To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Copyright infringement notice Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:55:13 -0500 On Wed August 22 2012 14:07, Robert Bonomi wrote:I'm NOT SURE whether the ISP has any potential liability in _this_ situation -- there's nothing 'published' by their customer for them to 'take down', etc.Actually, I believe in most cases the only way "they" (DMCA)There is no 'they' that is the DMCA -- it is simply a piece of legislation. That said, there is nothing the OP said to indicate that what he received _was_ a DMCA 'takedown notice'. although a follow-up did *assume* that that was what the OP received.
Yes... In this case, "they" would be the DMCA authors -- the RIAA and the MPAA. (which is what I suspect Mr. Smith actually meant). Owen
Current thread:
- Copyright infringement notice groupstudytac groupstudytac (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice William Herrin (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Robert Bonomi (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Larry Smith (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Robert Bonomi (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Owen DeLong (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Robert Bonomi (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice William Herrin (Aug 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Owen DeLong (Aug 22)
- RE: Copyright infringement notice Naslund, Steve (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Joly MacFie (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Aug 23)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice William Herrin (Aug 22)
- Re: Copyright infringement notice Owen DeLong (Aug 22)