nanog mailing list archives
Re: raging bulls
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:02:07 +0200
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 05:15:51PM -1000, Michael Painter wrote:
Eugen Leitl wrote:http://www.wired.com/business/2012/08/ff_wallstreet_trading/all/ Some interesting, network-relevant content there (but for the neutrino and drone rubbish).'Rubbish' might be a pretty strong word when you're talking about the players in this space.
If you want to shave off ms, using a source that takes at least minutes to accrue enough signal for a single bit is definitely not what you want. And drones across the Atlantic is way too Rube Goldbergesque to contemplate.
My favorite from the article: "But perhaps not even Einstein fully appreciated the degree to which electromagnetic waves bend in the presence of money. "
Maybe they should invest into a dense, a really low LEO sat constellation, and go by way of LoS laser.
Current thread:
- raging bulls Eugen Leitl (Aug 07)
- Re: raging bulls Michael Painter (Aug 07)
- Re: raging bulls Eugen Leitl (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- Re: raging bulls Brett Frankenberger (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls adam vitkovsky (Aug 08)
- Re: raging bulls Michael Loftis (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- Re: raging bulls Eugen Leitl (Aug 08)
- Re: raging bulls valdis . kletnieks (Aug 08)
- Re: raging bulls David Walker (Aug 09)
- Re: raging bulls Michael Painter (Aug 07)
- Re: raging bulls joel jaeggli (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)