nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:21:34 -0300
In case you feel a BGP announcement should not be "RPKI Invalid" but something else, you do what's described on slide 15-17: https://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/77-RIPE64-Plenery-RPKI.pdf
The same currently happens with DNSSEC, doing what Comcast calls "negative trust anchors": http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors-01 Rubens
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns?, (continued)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Nick Hilliard (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Phil Regnauld (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Nick Hilliard (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Rubens Kuhl (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Phil Regnauld (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Jennifer Rexford (Apr 29)
- Message not available
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Matthias Waehlisch (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Nick Hilliard (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 30)