nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question about peering
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 07:15:16 +0530
what does it cost you to peer, versus what does it cost you to not peer? if you are at the same ix the costs of peering are very low indeed On Saturday, April 7, 2012, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
Hello everyone I am curious to know how small ISPs plan peering with other interested parties. E.g if ISP A is connected to ISP C via big backbone ISP B, and say A and C both have open peering policy and assuming the exist in same exchange or nearby. Now at this point is there is any "minimum bandwidth" considerations? Say if A and C have 1Gbps + of flowing traffic - very likely peering would be good idea to save transit costs to B. But if A and C have very low levels - does it still makes sense? Does peering costs anything if ISPs are in same exchange? Does at low traffic level it makes more sense to keep on reaching other ISPs via big transit provider? Thanks. -- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected network! Twitter: @anurag_bhatia <https://twitter.com/#!/anurag_bhatia> Linkedin: http://linkedin.anuragbhatia.com
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Question about peering Anurag Bhatia (Apr 06)
- Re: Question about peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 06)
- Re: Question about peering Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Luke S. Crawford (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Luke S. Crawford (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Randy Bush (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 06)
- Re: Question about peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question about peering Joel M Snyder (Apr 07)