nanog mailing list archives
Re: Strange static route
From: Joel Maslak <jmaslak () antelope net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:18:42 -0600
Protection against learning a bad default route through whatever routing protocol they are learning, since these two routes would be more specific than any typical default route. They probably got burned learning a default route. On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com> wrote:
Hi, I have seen a few operators adding static routes like: 0.0.0.0/1 some next-hop and 128.0.0.0/1 some next-hop. Why would anyone want to add such static routes? What does 0.0.0.0/1 mean. Note that the netmask is 1 and not 0. Thanks, Glen
Current thread:
- Strange static route Glen Kent (Sep 23)
- Re: Strange static route Joel Maslak (Sep 23)
- Re: Strange static route jim deleskie (Sep 23)
- Re: Strange static route Christopher Morrow (Sep 23)
- Re: Strange static route Jimmy Hess (Sep 24)
- Re: Strange static route Jérôme Nicolle (Sep 25)
- Re: Strange static route jim deleskie (Sep 23)
- Re: Strange static route Jon Lewis (Sep 23)
- Re: Strange static route Stefan Fouant (Sep 23)
- Re: Strange static route Tom Storey (Sep 25)
- Re: Strange static route Joel Maslak (Sep 25)
- Re: Strange static route Joel Maslak (Sep 23)