nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing
From: PC <paul4004 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:23:41 -0600
I don't know every particular deal, but I felt it's a solution to the person's situation whom I replied to who was producing fake traffic for bandwidth they purchase. The point is to suggest that his pricing scheme where it's potential for the total bill to be cheaper by purposely wasting a resource and directing a traffic flood at the ISP's router or some poor sap's netblock is a suboptimal one and not in anyone's best interest. I don't know the costs of his deal, but I think that an arrangement which has progressed to the customer running a traffic flood to the SP core to get the bill down is not economically nor politically beneficial to anyone involved in that person's scenario anymore. The business conditions can throw a wrench into things though... a huge one. On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>wrote:
On Sep 22, 2011, at 1:54 AM, PC wrote:An optimal solution would be a tiered system where the adjusted priceonly applies to traffic units over the price tier threshold and not retroactively to all traffic units. Optimal for whom? Also, I doubt you can make that claim as you do not know the costs or other business conditions of every deal. -- TTFN, patrickOn Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith () gmail com> wrote:On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net wrote:If you have a lot more, you can negotiate tiers. E.g. The first 10G is $X/Mbps, but if you hit 20G, you get charged 20000 * $Y (where Y < X, obviously). This can lead to interesting situations where 19 Gbpscostsmore than 20 Gbps. But dems da breaks. -- TTFN, patrickI knew of a place that used to push "fake" traffic over a link to ensure they were in the cheaper (higher) tier. Who knew business rulesoverridingengineering could result in non-optimal situations. -- Brandon Galbraith US Voice: 630.492.0464
Current thread:
- Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Pradeep Bangera (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Brandon Galbraith (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing PC (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing PC (Sep 22)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Ryan Malayter (Sep 22)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing fredrik danerklint (Sep 22)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Matthew Palmer (Sep 22)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Brandon Galbraith (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 21)