nanog mailing list archives
Re: ouch..
From: Chris Woodfield <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:05:33 -0700
Or..."Go ahead and keep buying 6509 chassis, the 7600 brand is just a marketing thing" -C On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Always Learning [mailto:nanog () u61 u22 net] Sent: 14 September 2011 14:39 To: N. Max Pierson Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: ouch.. On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form somewhere for some feedback :)Slander means falsehood. Cisco tells lies ? -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU.Lies? So who has 100G MX series cards then..? -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Re: ouch.., (continued)
- Re: ouch.. David Israel (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Brandon Galbraith (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Jason Leschnik (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Owen DeLong (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Jima (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Chris Adams (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Jima (Sep 15)
- Message not available
- Re: ouch.. Matt Shadbolt (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Jay Ashworth (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Chris Woodfield (Sep 17)
- Re: ouch.. Brian Raaen (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Bret Clark (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Ahmed Maged (Sep 18)
- RE: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)