nanog mailing list archives
Re: ouch..
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:56:05 +0300
One:
Looks like some random person registered this one. The domain and ip do not look related to cisco even though someone has falsely pasted their logo all over the site.
Another:
Does seem odd that Cisco would use Go Daddy. My first thought was a disgruntled (ex) Juniper Employee. Then again, Juniper did bash Cisco in its cartoon strips all those years. Payback???
I'm bit surprised people actually think where campaign site is hosted and who has registered domain can be used to predict who is responsible for it. Cisco marketing probably have tons of webshops from whom they buy campaigns, what ever company was responsibly for winning this bid happens to use godaddy and rackspace. Our marketing has bought campaigns which have been hosted in our competitors networks, they don't understand to ask from the bidder where and how will the pages be hosted. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- ouch.. Martin Hepworth (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Vlad Galu (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Nick Hilliard (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Owen DeLong (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Brian Raaen (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Always Learning (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Frank Habicht (Sep 14)
- RE: ouch.. Erik Bais (Sep 14)
- RE: ouch.. Chuck Church (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Saku Ytti (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. N. Max Pierson (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Always Learning (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. sthaug (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. N. Max Pierson (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)
- RE: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Scott Morris (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. David Israel (Sep 14)