nanog mailing list archives
Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?
From: Christian de Larrinaga <cdel () firsthand net>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:27:50 +0100
exactly. don't plan to deploy what breaks things for the user edge. there are two issues here 1/ what ISPs do that might break things at the edge 2/ what edge stuff is doing that will break things at the other end edge of a connection It seems a bit odd that ISPs would actively plot to do 1/ whilst they could be making hard cash helping people at the edge avoid 2/ Odd because it adds a 3/ element which is stuff at the edge which will break stuff in the network. Do (some) operators see more money in a 1/2/3/ world? Christian On 8 Sep 2011, at 17:52, Dan Wing wrote:
Is there not a bit of CPE needed here? What should the CPE do? and not do? should it deprecate NAT/PAT when it receives 1918 allocation from a CGN?Careful with that idea -- people like their in-home network to continue functioning even when their ISP is down or having an outage.
Current thread:
- Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?, (continued)
- Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Lyle Giese (Sep 08)
- Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Randy Bush (Sep 08)
- Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Joel jaeggli (Sep 08)
- Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Lyle Giese (Sep 08)
- CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?) Jean-Francois . TremblayING (Sep 09)
- Re: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 09)
- Re: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?) Alexander Harrowell (Sep 09)
- Re: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?) Christian de Larrinaga (Sep 09)
- Re: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?) Dobbins, Roland (Sep 09)
- RE: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Dan Wing (Sep 08)
- Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Christian de Larrinaga (Sep 09)
- Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Owen DeLong (Sep 13)
- RE: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Dan Wing (Sep 13)
- Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ? Owen DeLong (Sep 14)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mark Tinka (Sep 10)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Jean-Francois . TremblayING (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? David Israel (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mike Jones (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Sep 08)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 09)