nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT444 or ?
From: Tore Anderson <tore.anderson () redpill-linpro com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:13:35 +0200
* Arturo Servin
NAT444 alone is not enough. You will need to deploy it along with 6rd or DS-lite.
In a typical DS-Lite deployment you won't be using NAT444. One of the key advantages of DS-Lite (and A+P, I believe) is that there's only one level of NAT between the end user and the public internet. -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
Current thread:
- NAT444 or ? Serge Vautour (Sep 01)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Cameron Byrne (Sep 01)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Douglas Otis (Sep 05)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Arturo Servin (Sep 06)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Tore Anderson (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Daniel Roesen (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Geoff Huston (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Seth Mos (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Tore Anderson (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Cameron Byrne (Sep 01)