Re: Cisco 7600 PFC3B(XL) and IPv6 packets with fragmentation header

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:
> > On Sep 30, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> >
> > > this is exactly why punting anything NOT management and/or routing-protocols should be banned. Thanks for making 
> > > that point explicitly.
> >
> > And this is the requirement which should be placed in RFPs, along with other specific requirements for ACL handling, 
> > flow telemetry functionality, uRPF, et. al.
> >
> > If folks want to influence vendors to do the Right Thing, they have to expend the time and effort to quantify and 
> > qualify said Right Thing(s), and then put it into RFP requirements.  Otherwise, complaining post-procurement isn't 
> > generally going to accomplish much.
>
> yes, my bitchfest was also a 'could we all start asking for this, now?' ... :)