nanog mailing list archives
Re: L3 announces new peering policy
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () latency net>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:54:58 -0400
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
Isn't it just more of the same, or am I brainnumb today?
What's changed is the introduction of "bit miles" as a means of calculating equality, where traffic ratios might previously have been used. Explained further, as pointed out on-list earlier: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021703819 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021703818 What will be interesting is whether new peering adjacencies crop up as a result of the new policy (I can think of several "smaller" global networks which now qualify, as it's written), or if this is just posturing on Level 3's part. The next few months will be interesting for sure... -a
Current thread:
- L3 announces new peering policy Jay Ashworth (Oct 12)
- Re: L3 announces new peering policy Pierfrancesco Caci (Oct 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: L3 announces new peering policy Scott Weeks (Oct 12)
- Re: L3 announces new peering policy Adam Rothschild (Oct 13)
- Re: L3 announces new peering policy Scott Weeks (Oct 13)
- Re: L3 announces new peering policy Tom Vest (Oct 13)
- Re: L3 announces new peering policy Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 13)
- Re: L3 announces new peering policy Tom Vest (Oct 13)