nanog mailing list archives
Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:02:17 -0400
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Keegan Holley <keegan.holley () sungard com> wrote:
2011/10/11 Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Keegan Holley <keegan.holley () sungard com> wrote:The definition of clean is also subjective. There are many who would run the IGP only for loopbacks and /30's and force everything into BGP even at small scale. BGP makes it easier to control the routing relationships between companies and pretty much removes the need for redistribution. There are trade-offs though, such as load-balancing.just loadbalance toward the next-hop, no?It depends on the IGP, whether the paths have exactly the same metric and whether or not you need to run MPLS.
sure.
Current thread:
- SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Tom Lanyon (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Matt Hite (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Keegan Holley (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Keegan Holley (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Oct 11)