nanog mailing list archives
RE: meeting network
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:12:27 -0500
Then the RFP for the meeting needs to be more specific with some basic SLAs that result in a smaller bill if not met. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:44 AM To: Randy Carpenter Cc: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: meeting network
I would think that the contract with the hotel for the conference would include the specific requirements for the network. Is that not the case?
underlying problems o no hotel believe that we'll actually be significantly high use. they simply can not conceive of it. ietf, apricot, ... have seen this time and time again o the hotel does not manage the network, so you have two comms hops to anyone who can do anything. and anyway, they are not going to provision more bandwidth but the problems of which i spoke were the meeting network. which we do supposedly control. randy
Current thread:
- Re: meeting network, (continued)
- Re: meeting network Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Michael Sinatra (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Nick Hilliard (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Owen DeLong (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Carpenter (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- RE: meeting network George, Wes (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 10)
- RE: meeting network Frank Bulk (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Jared Mauch (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Carpenter (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Carpenter (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Owen DeLong (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Richard Barnes (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Matt Ryanczak (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network JC Dill (Oct 10)
- RE: meeting network Menerick, John (Oct 10)
- RE: meeting network Frank Bulk (Oct 10)