nanog mailing list archives
Re: DPI deployment use case
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:31:14 -0400
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, PC <paul4004 () gmail com> wrote:
Your use case is not beyond the possibility of full DPI, but a transparent proxy box of some nature would be sufficient for most of that. Usage limits on the other hand is often easier done via your AAA accounting/radius solution, including policing/shaping/cutting users off/billing for overages. Ohh, and these boxes often make pretty pictures, graphs, and reports.
one wonders at the cost of these sorts of solutions relative to just link upgrades as well... for some deployments +1gbps capable boxes in redundant configs are far more expensive as compared with just upgrading 1gbps -> 10gbps ...
Current thread:
- DPI deployment use case Claudio Lapidus (Oct 05)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Martin Millnert (Oct 06)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Claudio Lapidus (Oct 07)
- Re: DPI deployment use case PC (Oct 07)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Christopher Morrow (Oct 07)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Randy Bush (Oct 07)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Michael Hallgren (Oct 07)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Claudio Lapidus (Oct 07)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Arturo Servin (Oct 10)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 12)
- Re: DPI deployment use case Martin Millnert (Oct 06)